# Effort-Based Work Assessment Framework # Version: 0.1 (Prototype for 6_0_3_0) # Updated: 2025-01-16 session_evaluation: attacker_effort: scoring_range: "1-10" criteria: - "time_invested: Hours logged vs task complexity" - "approach_quality: Systematic vs random problem-solving" - "communication: Clear progress updates, blockers identified" - "handoff_quality: Good briefing for next contributor" - "collaboration: Effective mentoring of defender" defender_learning: scoring_range: "1-10" criteria: - "engagement_level: Asked questions, participated actively" - "skill_acquisition: Demonstrated understanding of new concepts" - "contribution: Provided valuable input beyond observation" - "knowledge_transfer: Can explain what was learned" collaborative_quality: scoring_range: "1-10" criteria: - "adm_triangle_function: All three roles (A/D/Engelbot) working effectively" - "problem_solving: Used collective intelligence well" - "documentation: Session well-recorded for future contributors" - "handoff_preparation: Next contributor can pick up easily" payout_calculation: excellent_session: "95-100%" # High scores across all areas (27-30 total) good_session: "80-95%" # Solid effort, good collaboration (24-27 total) adequate_session: "60-80%" # Some issues but genuine work done (18-24 total) poor_session: "20-60%" # Problems with effort or collaboration (6-18 total) failed_session: "0-20%" # No real work attempted (0-6 total) # Special cases for nuanced assessment partial_payout_scenarios: time_vs_progress: "2 hours on 4-hour task with major breakthrough = full payout" learning_intensive: "Complex task where defender learning is primary value" research_dead_end: "Thorough investigation proving approach won't work" handoff_quality: "Incomplete work but excellent documentation for next person" breakthrough_discovery: "Unexpected insights that advance the mission significantly"